Author |
Message |
Fifth Decade
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:19 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:11 pm Posts: 3083
|
The Swiss have just voted in a Referendum to deport all foreigners who commit certain crimes. First they serve their sentence, then they are deported. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11857438Personally I can't see it having an effect on crime levels and would be against such a scheme, but I can understand the attractiveness of such a law to the man in the street. Would such a referendum be successful in the UK do you think? Mac
_________________ iMac, iPad, iPhone, Nikon and
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Smith
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:37 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:18 pm Posts: 1436 Location: Middle Earth
|
Personally if British nationals were convicted abroad, I wouldn't want them back in Blighty
_________________ I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out. Bill Hicks
'If we can find the money to kill people, we can find the money to help people' Tony Benn
l l
|
|
|
|
|
Fifth Decade
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:59 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:11 pm Posts: 3083
|
The problem is that this "Swiss People's Party" - known as the SVP over here is a quasi Fascist organisation that plays on the fears of ordinary people to gain power, just one small step at a time. Out of the 7 cabinet posts, they hold two seats - the Military and the Justice departments. Sometimes I worry the country will go the same way as George Haider took that province in Austria. Imagine having Nigel Farage in power and in control of both the Ministry of Defense and the Justice/Home Office departments.
Having said that, I bet holding a referendum in the UK and most Brits would vote for the same result.
_________________ iMac, iPad, iPhone, Nikon and
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy Haitz
|
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:15 am |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:14 pm Posts: 379 Location: Columbus Ohio USA
|
I would be in favor of deporting them. But I would probably do it immediately. Why support them for five to fifty years first. I should stay out of political discussions.
_________________ 2 Mini 2.3GHz Core i5 OSX10.7 / MacPro 2GHz DC Xeon 5130 OSX10.7 10.4 & WindowsXP / MDD 1GHzDP OSX10.4 & OS 9.2 / iBook G4 1.2GHz OSX10.4 / 9600/300 PPC OS9.2 / iPod 20GB 3rd Gen / iPad Wi-Fi 16GB 1st Gen iOS5 / iPhone 4 GSM 16GB iOS7
|
|
|
|
|
Fifth Decade
|
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:43 am |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:11 pm Posts: 3083
|
I agree spending the money to look after them for x years when you want to deport them anyway sounds silly, but I guess it allows their innocent wives and children who will be deported with them a little more time to get used to or grow up in the ways of the country from which they will eventually be kicked out of.
If it would act as a deterrent deportation might have more strength as an argument IMO, but I doubt people who commit crimes are bothered by deterrents until after they have committed the crime... having said that, what do you do with criminals after they have served their time? Treat them like everyone else, or continue to treat them as gulity? I honestly don't know.
_________________ iMac, iPad, iPhone, Nikon and
|
|
|
|
|
Rhakios
|
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:07 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:07 pm Posts: 185
|
|
|
|
|
Fifth Decade
|
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:18 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:11 pm Posts: 3083
|
I read once that the vast majority of murders are domestic. And manslaughter can be as simple as being careless without any malintent, but nonetheless still causing the death of someone eg leaving the goods on the back of your lorry insecure and something falls off and kills a passersby for instance.
_________________ iMac, iPad, iPhone, Nikon and
|
|
|
|
|
Rhakios
|
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:50 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:07 pm Posts: 185
|
Without going into too many details, his case was domestic and he served time in prison. He was found guilty of manslaughter because provocation was involved. However, all this really tells us is that whether someone, immigrant or not, can be rehabilitated into society, depends on them and their circumstances. That's the trouble with all blanket laws, they are a blunt tool at best.
|
|
|
|
|
bigdave
|
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:17 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:56 pm Posts: 1932
|
I personally think that if you commit a crime serious enough to receive a custodial sentence in a foreign country you should be ejected into the custody of your home countries prison system with future entry back into that country refused. The problem with that is where does the trial take place? who decides on the sentence? how can it be a fair trial? what if something which carries a custodial sentence in one country doesn't hold the same punishment in another? where would the convicted person appeal or apply for early release? So really, my argument holds no water whatsoever! Perhaps serve the sentence in the country in which the offense was committed then be ejected! or...... now this is just an idea but we could just send all criminals to an island on the other side of the world!?... I dont think its been tried before?!...
|
|
|
|
|
Fifth Decade
|
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 2:10 am |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:11 pm Posts: 3083
|
|
|
|
|
|