Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Donate    Amazon Affiliate

Board index » Couch




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 5152
An Article:

Free-to-air TV in the UK is almost universal, with consumers offered extensive programming via an antennae or satellite dish. However, an option to view the content over the Internet hasn’t always been available.

Back in 2007, TVCatchup spotted a gap in the market and over the years has been streaming TV shows to the masses for free but without rightsholders’ permission. In many markets TVCatchup would be immediately considered a ‘pirate’ service but the site had an unusual defense.

Under Section 73 of the UK’s Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, copyright in a wireless broadcast is not infringed when a party re-transmits that content by cable within “the area of initial broadcast”.

The legislation was drawn up to support the development of cable infrastructure in the 1980s and 1990s but TVCatchup felt that it applied to them when they captured UK broadcasters’ signals and retransmitted them over the Internet.

Needless to say, broadcasters including ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 felt differently. They took the service to court, arguing that the platform was illegal under Section 20 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA), which declares infringement when a copyrighted broadcast is communicated to the public.

The High Court sided with TVCatchup, so the broadcasters took the case to the Court of Appeal, arguing that Internet streaming services are not entitled to protection under legislation intended for cable operators.

In common with other complex copyright cases, the Court of Appeal sought clarification from the Court of Justice of the European Union. Taking the view that section 73 of the CDPA should be interpreted in the light of Article 9 of Directive 2001/29, the Court of Appeal asked several questions, including whether the term “cable” could refer to Internet services.

The CJEU handed down its decision yesterday, ruling that when TVCatchup streamed copyrighted content without permission, that amounted to a communication to the public and was therefore illegal.

“The principal objective of that directive is to establish a high level of protection of authors, allowing them to obtain an appropriate reward for the use of their works, including on the occasion of communication to the public,” the Court wrote.

“Having regard to that high level of protection of authors, the Court …. held that the concept of ‘communication to the public’ … must be interpreted broadly … and that a retransmission by means of an internet stream, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, constitutes such a communication.”

Additionally, the CJEU found that Article 9 of Directive 2001/29 does not permit “national legislation which provides that copyright is not infringed in the case of the immediate retransmission by cable, including, where relevant, via the internet.”

That statement is effectively a huge thumbs-down to Section 73 of the CDPA on which TVCatchup had formed its defense.

While that will be bad news for TVCatchup, it will be of little hardship to the UK Government. The Digital Economy Bill currently moving through Parliament contains an amendment to remove Section 73 from the CDPA, with the government noting during a consultation that it was never intended to apply to Internet services.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:25 pm
Posts: 2992
Sounds like a quibble really. The affected broadcasters have their own CatchUp TV services online, as does the BBC with iPlayer, so who's it going to affect?

_________________
"If it ain't broke, we can fix it" (© Tim Cook, Jonny Ive)

Core i7 2011 21.5" iMac 12,1 2.8 GHz 16GB RAM OS X 10.9.5 1TB SSD & 128GB SSD


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 5152
Ah.
I thought that this was CatchUp TV.

Sorry. I guess that it won't affect anyone!
Or, it will affect the people who waste their time reading this.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:25 pm
Posts: 2992
I presume TVCatchUp is a specific bit of software not owned and run by the main broadcasters? The one negative of ordinary Catch Up TV is you have to go to separate sites for each main broadcaster, so that's iPlayer for BBC, then there's the ITV Hub, then 4OD, then 5OD, etc.

_________________
"If it ain't broke, we can fix it" (© Tim Cook, Jonny Ive)

Core i7 2011 21.5" iMac 12,1 2.8 GHz 16GB RAM OS X 10.9.5 1TB SSD & 128GB SSD


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:31 pm
Posts: 1418
Location: Glasgow
TVcatchup was a website that streamed all the freeview channels live (not they're catchup service). It was a godsend to iPhone users who could watch freeview channels on their iPhones. I used to use it but not for years. It was perfect for bedrooms computers as you didn't need to have an antenna cable running through your house.


http://tvcatchup.com

_________________
Gary.

______________
█████████
-- RANGERS FC --


"Macintosh - We might not get everything right, but at least we knew the century was going to end." Douglas Adams.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

Board index » Couch


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

 

HTML tutorial

cron